Showing posts with label flash photography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label flash photography. Show all posts

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Man, hear I go yammering about Weegee again.



Look the man wasn't a genius in terms of IQ points, but Arthur Fellig the photographer-popularly-known-as Weegee paved the way for other low brow photographers like Diane Arbus and Nan Goldin, Cindy Sherman and Nikki Lee. Oh, and punk photography in general. And what I mean by that is he paved the way for low brow photography to be accepted by the grand poo pah of photography: art photography.

Weegee was ugly, poor, and obsessed with the blood and guts of his city. As a photojournalist, he got his hands dirty and wasn't afraid to break the sacred rules of journalism. He'd pose people and rearrange crime scenes for maximum impact. He wrote his own often lengthy captions and was even occasionally given license to write the articles that accompanied his photos in the newspapers he shot for. That was unheard of back then.

I finished up Weegee and Naked City by Lee and Meyer. Its a short book with a few plates but mostly words. The book analyzes the characters and circumstances that paved the way for his only photography book Naked City and his pioneering photo exhibit at the New York Photo League called Murder Is My Business. It's a terrific and easy read with a fresh approach to the man and his work. I was delighted to find out just how self aware he was of what he was doing. He the man himself is imbedded in his photos - sometimes literally - because he WANTED to be famous. He wanted people to know his name and made no qualms about it. A left leaning press was of course going to bring him on as an ally with his everyman appeal. He gave that movement street cred as much as he gave it a visual style. And being no dummy, he used this unique (but earned) respect to further his transparent goals of 1) fame, and 2) legitimacy among the fine art cognicenti. Frakkin' genius.

Weegee may have been opportunistic (how's that a bad thing again?) but he also took complete ownership of his photographs, and I'm not talking about copyrights (who cares?). I mean the man walked the walk and talked the talk. He came from the same mean streets of NY that he shot and is a prime example of the kind of photographers I admire most: those who live their art. Photographs aren't just images - that's a cynical point of view if there ever was one. Photographers are performance artists first and foremost. Self awareness to the point of obsession - 'Look at me looking at you'. We hunt and kill what we eat. Because it's only fair.

And further to the low brow point, he mastered the use of flash like nobody's business. Flash use has always played second fiddle to natural light sources or studio light that mimics natural light. But here's the truth art photography is too precious to embrace: it's HARDER TO MASTER flash. Certainly much more difficult to master than natural diffuse light. Which is secretly why high brow art hates it's use there I said it. I'll even take it a step further and declare flash-lit black and white journalistic/punk/street photography is as American a treasure as jazz or blues or dare she say it? rock and roll.

So hail to you, Weege. You punk.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Overblown: D76 at 9 1/2 minutes

I've been a bit lazy about carrying two cameras around my neck this season which I used to do it all the time. My modus operundi used to be to have my Nikon FA with a 20 or 24mm lens and a flash affixed around one shoulder. And on the other I'd have my Nikon F2 with a 50mm lens (sans flash). The reason I would do this is that I would push my non-flash film a stop or two, and process the strobe-lit film at-speed. But the cameras are so damn heavy! Plus it's hard to maneuver through a crowd without stabbing someone in the back with one of your protruding lenses. So it was with little (honestly) trepidation that I went up to the Gay Marriage show last month with one camera, two lenses, a flash, and a point-and-shoot.


Nikon FA, 50mm lens, F1.4, Tri-X 400, D76 at 9 1/2 minutes, scan of negative

That's Robert of the Assholes. It's a little contrasty, but I could fix it up in the darkroom easily if I wanted to.

Here is a scan of another frame of the same film strip. But this time I used a flash and a shorter lens with a larger f-stop (3.5, I believe).



This scan describes pretty vividly why *I* need to use two cameras if I want to use a flash and natural light. You may be able to discern that's Mikey of Gay Marriage. I turned the brightness way down in Photoshop and what I got left with was a really noisy image with really no redeeming characteristics. I wouldn't even attempt to print it in the darkroom.

For the record, Digital Truth recommends that the film be cooked for between 6.75 and 8 minutes to develop at-speed. At 9.5 minutes, I pushed the film (arguably) about one stop.

A note about chemistry: That was the last of my D76. I'll use it again in the future - it keeps well and it makes a fantastic backup. But I have a big order from Freestyle on the way: more Diafine, more Adox ATM49, and even some Rodinal which I've never used, plus a smattering of non-Tri-X film. This season is going to be about experimenting with chemistry - all the more reason to be consistent in the field.

This entry is a note to myself to not cry when I blow out film because I don't want neck-strain in the morning. Work harder! Do better!

Two cameras it is...sorry in advance if I poke you with my lens.